Perbandingan Sanksi Pidana Dan Pemulihan Kerugian Negara Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Studi Kasus: Harvey Moeis

Authors

  • Cheryl Renada Larasati Universitas Terbuka Author

Abstract

Corruption is a form of lawlessness that can damage the fabric of society. The losses caused by acts of corruption must also be reconstructed with real and firm efforts by the government. Recovery of assets from corrupt actors is a rational form. The tin corruption case by PT Tbk is one of the major acts of corruption involving the company president, Harvey Moeis, with state losses reaching 270 trillion rupiah. The research in this writing uses doctrinal research or normative law. The approach used is comparative law related to law. The aim of this research is to obtain an overview in accordance with applicable facts using data sources, both primary data and secondary data. Based on the results of the analysis, it is known that Harvey Moeis was sentenced to 20 years in prison, a fine of 1 billion, and state losses of 420 billion were recovered. The investigation into the losses and magnitude of the country has been considered in collaboration between the company and the government. If Harvey Moeis cannot pay the state's losses, it will be replaced by additional confinement for 10 years. The provision of sanctions for 20 years with fines and repayment of losses to the country regarding the crime of corruption and money laundering committed by Harvey Moise is in line with the Law Article 2 paragraph (1), Article 18 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code and Article 3 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of TPPU in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code. Therefore, the results of the decision are considered to be in accordance with state law.

 

References

Ashinin, A., Cindy, A., Arifin, H. E., & Tedjaseputra, J. A. (2023). Menjadi Mata Keadilan: Memantau Untuk Perubahan Pelatihan Advokasi Berbasis Data Untuk Masyarakat Sipil Tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana …. Korupsi.

Faaza, R. N. N. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Sanksi Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/de3ff38d9de44f55c6f62a3d680e9d8c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y

Fadhilah, I. (2023). Analisis Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Sosial dan Hadis: Implikasinya Terhadap Pendidikan Agama Islam. ASWAJA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keislaman. https://guru-aswaja.com/ejurnal/index.php/aswaja/article/view/73

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi Melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(7), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.249

Fernando, Z. J., Pujiyono, & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Perampasan Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(1), 83–93. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/805

Ghozali, E. (2016). Kebijakan Pemberian Hak Remisi Narapidana Kasus Korupsi. Jurnal Litigasi, 17(1), 3167–3220.

Harefa, A. (2022). Problematika Penegakan Hukum Pidana Mati Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan HAM. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1(2), 99–116. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan/article/view/456

Maringka. (2022). Reformasi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. In Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oOSCEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=membangun+ketahanan+anti+korupsi+di+indonesia&ots=rQKnGIAzyy&sig=_TEvKOMkfuVJZzrVQHVO4QZ17N0

Mendrofa, A. (2016). Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Era Reformasi; Konsep Dan Regulasi. Litigasi, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v16i1.54

Prahassacitta, V. (2018). Tinjauan Atas Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Penyuapan Di Sektor Privat Dalam Hukum Nasional Indonesia: Suatu Perbandingan Dengan Singapura, Malaysia Dan Korea Selatan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.21143/.vol47.no4.1584

RAZI, F. (2015). PEMBERIAN REMISI TERHADAP TERPIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERWUJUDAN PERSAMAAN KEDUDUKAN DALAM HUKUM. Palgrave Publishers Ltd, 5(4), 255.

Suhendar, S., & Kartono, K. (2020). Kerugian Keuangan Negara Telaah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Hukum Pidana. In Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 233–246). academia.edu. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v11i2.8048

Syarifuddin, S. (2016). Relevansi Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1979 Tentang Ekstradisi Dengan Perkembangan Hukum Ekstradisi Internasional (Studi Kasus : Perjanjian Ekstradisi Indonesia-Singapura). Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v2i1.7284

Widiyani, H., Sucipta, P. R., Siregar, A. A., & Efritadewi, A. (2021). KAJIAN KRIMINOLOGIS TERJADI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANA DESA DI DESA PENAGA (Studi Desa Penaga Kabupaten Bintan Kepulauan Riau). Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 9(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v9i1.2059

Published

20-06-2025

How to Cite

Perbandingan Sanksi Pidana Dan Pemulihan Kerugian Negara Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Studi Kasus: Harvey Moeis. (2025). HARISA: Jurnal Hukum, Syariah, Dan Sosial, 2((1), 200-216. https://ejournal.eddhuhacenter.com/index.php/harisa/article/view/72